Countries and Companies
As I was reading the Mezzanine by Nicholson Baker, one passage toward the end of the book stood out to me. On page 114, Howie says “Was there really any need to study the historical past of Chandragupta of Pataliputra, or Harsha of Kanauj, the rise of the Chola kings of Tanjore and the fall of the Pallava kings of Kanchi, who once built the Seven Pagodas of Mahabalipuram, or the final desolation and ruin of the great metropolis of Vijayanagar, when we had dynastic shifts, turbulence, and plenty of lather in the last twenty years of that great Hindu inheritance, shampoo?” This is a somewhat odd analogy but like many other passages in the book, you can kind of see where he is coming from.
I don’t think this observation is limited to shampoos, many consumer items share in this similar change in name brands similar to that of the changing of the ruling class. The constant advertisement of various brands trying to gain an edge on the competition means you can’t help but know a thing or two about who is on top for certain products. I do not drink carbonated beverages and yet I am very aware of the Coca-Cola/Pepsi rivalry that exists with others like Sprite and Dr. Pepper also being large brands. This is certainly a feature of living in the era that we do with fast innovation and the free market, you would not expect to see the same large brands and shifts in these brands thousands or even hundreds of years ago.
When a government breaks up a monopoly, it is similar to the disillusionment of a greater country or empire like the USSR in 1991 or Yugoslavia in 1992. One company that this reminds me of is the break up of the Ma Bell in the 1980s. It makes me think of Bell System as the large government that breaks apart into the smaller countries becoming the Baby Bells. The telephone networks have since undergone more change and now the large brands are names like Verizon and T-Mobile. The Bell corporation lives on but under the name AT&T, nowhere near as strong or large an empire that it once had.ct to see the same large brands and shifts in these brands thousands or even hundreds of years ago.
![]() |
| Break up of Bell System |
Mergers remind me of two countries coming together to create a larger, stronger country like the Germanic states unifying as one in 1871 (or 1990). Although there was the recent merger of T-Mobile and Sprint, mergers happen all the time such as Delta Airlines and Northwest Airlines back in 2008. The new Delta Airlines is still a big player in the industry.
![]() |
| Unification of Germany 1871 |
Empires rise and fall all over the world throughout history. The decline of Yahoo and the emergence of Google as the preferred internet search engine. The purchasing of another company like Facebook’s acquisition of Instagram feels similar to the annexation of a smaller country. I had much more to say about this topic than I initially thought. There are so many parallels you can draw between consumer product brands and national governments. The actions of governments and companies are analogous in ways I had not thought of before and that the Mezzanine has brought to the forefront of my mind.

-en.png)
My instinct after reading this post is to connect it all back to The Mezzanine in some way, and I think I've figured out how. When Aurelius' speaks about the triviality and transience of life, Howie discounts this opinion. I think that this idea of empires paralleling companies and their respective life spans really does support Aurelius' theory. However, the idea that both of these civilizations and inventions build off of one another into a growing infinity of progress, I think, supports Howie's point that life can't just be so fleeting if we're always experiencing it (although I may be editorializing Howie's train of thought a bit).
ReplyDelete